Evaluation about the groups

TPACK EVALUATION

Hi! I am the Analyst again, now we are going to show you our evaluations about the work of the different groups we saw in the class the last day:

1. The little ants

      We think that the work of this group has been original and their pictures were very    

      nice. However the poster had a lot of information and it wasn’t very clear.

      We would copy the main structure of the poster and the pictures.

2. T8T

The star of this group has talked with fluency, we also noticed that she knew a lot about the topic and the poster was simple and clear, and easy to understand. The only thing that we consider that wasn’t too good is that she talked very fast, and sometimes we couldn’t understand the things. 

       We would copy the way to explain the task.

3. Brain Storming

In our opinion the best of this group has been that the star was always catching our attention, she talked clearly and about the history of tpack. However the poster was not very original.               

      We would copy the way she explained the topic.

4. Teachleaders

The best thing of this group was their poster and that they gave a lot of examples to clarify the information. The presentation was also dynamic but it was a bit long and sometimes slow.

We would copy the examples they gave in every moment.

5. Give me 7

We consider that the star of this group had fluency and that he knew very well the information. We also noticed that they worked on this task because they had original examples on their poster. However we think that the poster wasn’t very clear because it had a lot of information.

We would copy the resources, for example the computer, they used to make the task.

 6. Education Rush Hour

The best thing we have considered about this group is that they were very original i the way they explain the content, very dynamic, with a lot of examples and easy to understand. The worst thing that we considered they had is that TPACK wasn’t very visible in the paper and it is the main point.

We would copy the fluency, the examples and the way she have explained the content.

7. Step by step

We have considered that the best about this group has been the clarity of their ideas and that they have explained the topic with fluency. On the other hand the presentation hasn’t been very dynamic.

We would copy their original poster and the confidence of their star.

8. Hide and seek

We considered that the poster of this group was original and we noticed that they worked on the task. But they talked very low and we can’t hear very well the explanation.

We would copy from them the pictures of the paper that were very nice and clear.